OpenJurist

101 F3d 695 Marks v. Supreme Court of Virginia

101 F.3d 695

Brenda J. MARKS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA; Christopher Hutton,
Commonwealth's Attorney City of Hampton; James C.
O'Shields; Hampton General District Court, Eighth Judicial
District; Honorable Henry D. Kashouty; Honorable Wilford
Taylor, Jr.; Hono rable William C. Andrews, III; Harriette
Spencer, Clerk, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-1605.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 1996.
Decided Nov. 18, 1996.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Brenda J. Marks, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Robert Messitt, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Samuel Lawrence Dumville, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Marks v. Supreme Court of Virginia, No. CA-95-71-4 (E.D.Va. Mar. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED