OpenJurist

101 F3d 695 United States v. Craven

101 F.3d 695

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James Millard CRAVEN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-6453.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 31, 1996.
Decided Nov. 15, 1996.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James Millard Craven, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Stanley Glaser, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

M.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Craven, Nos. CR-91-229-R; CA-95-69-4 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.