103 F.3d 143
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
Colin Charles ROUSE, aka Charles Ryan, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 5, 1996.*
Decided Nov. 7, 1996.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Federal prisoner Colin Charles Rouse appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We review de novo, Frazer v. United States, 18 F.3d 778, 781 (9th Cir.1994), and affirm.
Rouse's claims are foreclosed by United States v. McMullen, No. 95-36031, slip op. 14007 (9th Cir. Oct. 23, 1996).