OpenJurist

104 F3d 360 United States v. Stancil

104 F.3d 360

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ephraim Vandorian STANCIL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-6871.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Dec. 19, 1996.
Submitted Dec. 12, 1996.
Decided Dec. 19, 1996.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Rockingham. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-89-237-R, CA-95-625-3)

Ephraim Vandorian Stancil, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Stanley Glaser, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

M.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Stancil, Nos. CR-89-237-R; CA95-625-3 (M.D.N.C. May 20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.