OpenJurist

105 F3d 646 Bridgeman v. S Beardsley Doe

105 F.3d 646

William C. BRIDGEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ralph S. BEARDSLEY, Warden; Sergeant Pritcherd; Thomas
Smith; Michael Moore; William Catoe; George
Martin; Sergeant Roach; Sergeant
Brown, Defendants-Appellees,
and
John DOE, Lieutenant; Lieutenant Lane, Defendants,
v.
David John LEWIS, Movant.

No. 96-7363.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 10, 1996.
Decided Jan. 9, 1997.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William C. Bridgeman, Appellant Pro Se.

Andrew Frederick Lindemann, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bridgeman v. Beardsley, No. CA-95-1998-2-3AJ (D.S.C. Aug. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED