OpenJurist

107 F3d 923 Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States v. Northwest Airlines Inc

107 F.3d 923

323 U.S.App.D.C. 290

TAIPEI ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL REPRESENTATIVE OFFICE, IN THE
UNITED STATES, Appellant,
v.
NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC., Appellee.

No. 96-7008.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Nov. 12, 1996.

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

Before WILLIAMS, HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal was considered on the record before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs of counsel. The issues have been accorded full consideration by this court and occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 36(b).

2

Appellant challenges the district court's dismissal of its declaratory judgment action for lack of jurisdiction and the denial of its motion to amend the complaint and present newly discovered evidence. Substantially for the reasons articulated by the district court in its various memoranda and orders, see, e.g., Coordination Council for North American Affairs v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., Civil Action No. 94-1766 (D.D.C. Nov. 18, 1995), it is

3

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this court that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.

4

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41(a).