Boggs v. F Boggs M B

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 1997.

Relies on Boggs v. Boggs

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 2010

1 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Marian M. Livaudais, Livaudais & Livaudais, Mandeville, LA, James F. Willeford, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Susan Rees, Plan Benefits Security Division, N-4611, Office of Solicitor, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, DC, for Dept. of Labor, Amicus Curiae.

Thomas F. Boggs, Monroe, LA, Pro Se.

Guy L. Deano, Jr., Deano & Deano, Mandeville, LA, for Harry Boggs & David Boggs.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; A.J. McNamara, Judge.

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court

Before WISDOM, KING and DUHE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The district court's order granting summary judgment in the above-styled action is VACATED. The case is REMANDED to the district court for proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court's pronouncement in Boggs v. Boggs, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 1754, 138 L.Ed.2d 45 (1997).