McDaniel v. Appraisal Institute

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Sept. 16, 1997.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1997-09-16

Relies on McDaniel v. Appraisal Institute · Hyland v. Wonder

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-09-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2022

2 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ORDER

¶1

The concurring opinion, filed June 30, 1997 [117 F.3d 421], is amended as follows:

¶2

Delete the first full sentence on Slip Opinion page 7592 [117 F.3d at 424], starting with "The Institute ..." and replace it with: "The Institute only accepts between two and seven percent of its candidates, and MAI appraisers get over 90% of the commercial business in Southern Arizona."

¶3

With the above amendment, the appellant's petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED. The appellee's petition for rehearing is also DENIED.