139 F.3d 905
81 A.F.T.R.2d 98-900
Robert HOGUE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; Hal Muns, Defendants-Appellees.
D.C. No. CV-96-01838-WBS/GGH.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted February 9, 1998.**
Decided Feb. 19, 1998.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding.
Before PREGERSON, CANBY and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
Robert Hogue appeals pro se the district court summary judgment dismissal for lack of standing of his action challenging the validity of the Internal Revenue Service's seizure and sale of an automobile. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed February 28, 1997.