OpenJurist

150 US 82 Bushnell v. Crooke Mining Smelting Co

150 U.S. 82

14 S.Ct. 22

37 L.Ed. 1007

BUSHNELL et al.
v.
CROOKE MINING & SMELTING CO.

No. 195.

October 30, 1893.

A. R. Bushnell, for the motion.

Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.

1

We should not have been called on to reiterate the rule that an application for a rehearing cannot be entertained when presented after the expiration of the term at which the judgment was rendered. Hudson v. Guestier, 7 Cranch, 1; Browder v. McArthur, 7 Wheat. 58; Sibald v. U. S., 12 Pet. 488; Brooks v. Railroad Co., 102 U. S. 107; Williams v. Conger, 131 U. S. 390 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 793. Application denied.