OpenJurist

19 F3d 1430 Schroyer v. Ec Morris

19 F.3d 1430

Daniel Marion SCHROYER, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
E.C. MORRIS; W.P. Rogers; James A. Smith; Ms. Rowelett;
Ms. Wilkerson; E.B. Wright; L.T. Lester; Marci
Ornales; F. Kafka, Ms.; Mr. Kline;
Lynn Armentrout, Sheriff
Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6027.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided March 17, 1994.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-93-1100)

Daniel Marion Schroyer, appellant pro se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064 (4th Cir.1993). This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

2

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED