OpenJurist

201 F2d 512 Hook v. Hook & Ackerman

201 F.2d 512

C. Howard HOOK and W. W. Miller, Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller

v.

HOOK & ACKERMAN, Inc., Appellant.

No. 10828.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued January 22, 1953.

Decided February 6, 1953.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; William Alva Stewart, Judge.

Harry Price, New York City (Stonecipher & Cunningham, by Charles L. Cunningham, Pittsburgh, Pa., Matthew Sidney Biron, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman, Inc.

William B. Jaspert, Pittsburgh, Pa., for C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, ind. and d/b/a/ Hook & Miller; and R. O. Graffius.

Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Points presented in this appeal were all discussed in the opinion of Judge Stewart in the district court. Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc., D.C.W.D.Pa.1952, 103 F. Supp. 790. We think that he was right and affirm for the reasons set out in his opinion.

2

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.