201 F2d 512 Hook v. Hook & Ackerman

201 F.2d 512

C. Howard HOOK and W. W. Miller, Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller


HOOK & ACKERMAN, Inc., Appellant.

No. 10828.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued January 22, 1953.

Decided February 6, 1953.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; William Alva Stewart, Judge.

Harry Price, New York City (Stonecipher & Cunningham, by Charles L. Cunningham, Pittsburgh, Pa., Matthew Sidney Biron, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman, Inc.

William B. Jaspert, Pittsburgh, Pa., for C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, ind. and d/b/a/ Hook & Miller; and R. O. Graffius.

Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.


view counter

Points presented in this appeal were all discussed in the opinion of Judge Stewart in the district court. Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc., D.C.W.D.Pa.1952, 103 F. Supp. 790. We think that he was right and affirm for the reasons set out in his opinion.


The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.