OpenJurist

237 F2d 920 Huston v. Buckeye Bait Corporation H

237 F.2d 920

112 U.S.P.Q. 4

James L. HUSTON and Dayton Bait Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

BUCKEYE BAIT CORPORATION, Buckeye Molding Company, and

William H. Robinson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12718.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 22, 1956.

Des Jardins, Robinson & Keiser, Cincinnati, Ohio, Henry G. Dybvig, Dayton, Ohio, for appellants.

Irvin V. Gleim, Dayton, Ohio, Dexter N. Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.

Before ALLEN, McALLISTER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs, of the parties, and the argument of counsel, and the court being duly advised,

2

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the district court and for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Cecil. 145 F.Supp. 600.