Willie Wilson and Morris Griffin v. United States

June 13, 1958, Rehearing Denied July 30, 1958.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1958-06-13

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Wilson · Railway Supply & Mfg. Co. v. Shawnee-Penn Mfg. Co. · 159 F. Supp. 159 - Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Hamilton Manufacturing Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1958-06-13

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 1997

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama; Frank M. Johnson, Jr., Judge.

See, also, 159 F.Supp. 159.

John C. Walters, Troy, Ala., L. H. Walden, Montgomery, Ala., for appellant.

Hartwell Davis, U.S. Atty., Montgomery, Ala., Robert E. Varner, Asst. U.S. Atty., Montgomery, Ala., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and CAMERON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

In his well considered and thoughtful opinion,1 the district judge carefully stated and as carefully canvassed the questions raised on this appeal and fully and correctly dealt with them. Because he did, it will serve no useful purpose for us to restate or rediscuss them. It will be sufficient to say that we agree with the opinion of the district judge, and, upon the considerations and for the reasons stated by him, the judgment is affirmed.

¶2

CAMERON, Circuit Judge.

¶3

I concur in the result.

United States v. Wilson and Griffin, 158 F.Supp. 442