36 F3d 1095 United States v. R Paisley
36 F.3d 1095
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
Melvin R. PAISLEY, Defendant Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 6, 1994
Decided: September 23, 1994.
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CR-91-236)
Melvin R. Paisley, Appellant Pro Se.
Jack I. Hanly, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Paisley, No. CR-91-236 (E.D. Va. May 23, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
We deny Appellant's Motion for Default. Given the disposition of his appeal, Appellant's Motion for Bond Pending the Determination of the Merits of the Appeal is now moot and is denied for that reason