OpenJurist

36 F3d 1095 United States v. Thomas

36 F.3d 1095

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Sean Michael THOMAS, Defendant Appellant.

No. 94-6053.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 1994.
Decided September 26, 1994.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-91, CA-93-690)

Sean Michael Thomas, appellant pro se.

John Howarth Bennett, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Thomas, Nos. CR-92-91; CA-93-690 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED