OpenJurist

36 F3d 1095 Venson v. Gee

36 F.3d 1095

Kevin Edward VENSON, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Archie GEE, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, Respondents Appellees.

No. 94-6638.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 16, 1994.
Decided: Sept. 28, 1994.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M.J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-93-1323-MJG)

Kevin Edward Venson, petitioner pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Thomas Kevin Clancy, Assistant Attorney General, Kathryn Grill Graeff, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Venson v. Gee, No. CA-93-1323-MJG (D. Md. Apr. 11, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED