OpenJurist

36 F3d 127 Stone v. Williams & Connolly

36 F.3d 127

308 U.S.App.D.C. 313

Rhonda STONE, Appellant,
v.
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY, et al.

No. 93-7098.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Aug. 19, 1994.

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge; SILBERMAN and BUCKLEY, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 36(b). It is

2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's memorandum opinion filed December 11, 1992, and its order filed March 24, 1993 be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein.

3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41.