OpenJurist

375 US 22 Shockey v. Illinois

375 U.S. 22

84 S.Ct. 83

11 L.Ed.2d 43

Eugene F. SHOCKEY
v.
ILLINOIS.

No. 20, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 14, 1963

John R. Snively, for petitioner.

William G. Clark, Atty. Gen. of Illinois, for respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois.

PER CURIAM.

1

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Illinois for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811.

2

Mr. Justice HARLAN, for the reasons stated in Daegele v. Kansas, 375 U.S. 1, 84 S.Ct. 89, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.