378 U.S. 584
84 S.Ct. 1929
12 L.Ed.2d 1039
Sherman H. CROUSE, Warden.
No. 915, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 22, 1964
Sidney Smith, pro se.
William M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen. of Kansas, and J. richard Foth, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kansas.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, dissenting.
In my opinion the question whether Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811, should be given retroactive application is deserving of plenary consideration. Cf. my dissenting opinion, LaVallee v. Durocher, 84 S.Ct. 1921.