OpenJurist

386 US 212 Phillips v. California

386 U.S. 212

87 S.Ct. 977

17 L.Ed.2d 870

Janet PHILLIPS and William Ross Phillips
v.
CALIFORNIA.

No. 684, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 27, 1967

Rehearing Denied April 10, 1967.

See 386 U.S. 1000, 87 S.Ct. 1311.

Janet Phillips and William Ross Phillips, pro se.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and S. Clark Moore, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District.

PER CURIAM.

1

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824.

2

Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice CLARK are of the opinion that the judgment should be vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. State of California, supra.

3

Mr. Justice HARLAN would affirm the judgment below for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S., at 45, 87 S.Ct., at 839.