394 F2d 3 Silva v. United States
394 F.2d 3
Stanley Francis SILVA, Appellant,
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
April 16, 1968.
Milton W. B. Choy (argued), Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellant.
Michael D. Hong (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Yoshimi Hayashi, U.S. Atty., James F. Ventura, Asst. U.S. Atty., Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, BARNES and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges.
The defendant's in-custody confession was inadmissible for lack of a Miranda-type type warning, inasmuch as his trial was commenced post-Miranda. Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).