OpenJurist

394 F2d 3 Silva v. United States

394 F.2d 3

Stanley Francis SILVA, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 21978.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

April 16, 1968.

Milton W. B. Choy (argued), Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellant.

Michael D. Hong (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Yoshimi Hayashi, U.S. Atty., James F. Ventura, Asst. U.S. Atty., Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, BARNES and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The defendant's in-custody confession was inadmissible for lack of a Miranda-type type warning, inasmuch as his trial was commenced post-Miranda. Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).

2

The judgment of conviction is reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 721, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966). Cf. Groshart v. United States, 392 F.2d 172, (9th Cir. 1968).