OpenJurist

43 F3d 712 Autek Systems Corporation v. United States F a

43 F.3d 712

310 U.S.App.D.C. 61

AUTEK SYSTEMS CORPORATION,
v.
UNITED STATES of America; Small Business Administration;
Patricia F. Saiki, Honorable, Administrator of the Small
Business Administration; Judith A. Watts, Associate
Administrator of the Minority Small Business and Capital
Ownership Development; Erskine Bowles, Administrator of the
Small Business Administration.

No. 93-5399.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 13, 1994.

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge, and SILBERMAN and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

1

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the response thereto, and the reply, it is

2

ORDERED that the motion be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed October 22, 1993. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).

3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41.