446 F2d 224 United States v. Dixon

446 F.2d 224

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Edward Elmer DIXON, Appellant.

No. 71-1134.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 7, 1971.

PER CURIAM:

view counter
1

The main objection is that one exhibit was admitted without sufficient foundation. But we hold there was some identification and that the objection to admission was not specific enough.

2

As to the necessity of preserving material footprints, the point is a good jury argument, but such procedure is not a legal requirement. United States v. Hull, 9 Cir., 441 F.2d 1165, decided May 10, 1971.

3

Louis L. Deckter (argued), Tucson, Ariz., for appellant.

4

Stanley L. Patchell (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Richard K. Burke, U.S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for appellee.