456 F2d 1311 United States v. De Smet

456 F.2d 1311

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Joel Mark DE SMET, Appellant.

No. 71-2811.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

April 11, 1972.

Joel Shawn (argued), of Lukes & Bassoni, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Stephen E. Clark (argued), of Athearn, Chandler, & Hoffman, James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

view counter
1

The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.

2

We decide here that if there was some irregularity in the "call" process, there is no evidence of prejudice to De Smet.

3

However, we reject the contention that there was irregularity in the "calling."