48 F3d 562 Paul v. Roach Organization Inc

48 F.3d 562

310 U.S.App.D.C. 386

Alberta PAUL, Appellant,

No. 94-7092.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Jan. 24, 1995.

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

Before: WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.



view counter

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 36(b). It is


ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed. As the district court stated in its order, filed November 9, 1993, Paul failed to rebut the presumption that she was an at-will employee by showing that the parties intended for the employment to be either for a fixed period or subject to specific preconditions before termination.


The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41.