OpenJurist

49 F3d 127 Rhodes v. Guiberson Oil Tools Fie D

49 F.3d 127

67 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 981

Calvin RHODES, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,
v.
GUIBERSON OIL TOOLS, a/k/a F.I.E., a/k/a Div. Dresser Ind.
Inc., Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

No. 92-3770.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

March 16, 1995.

Thomas J. Lutkewitte, J. Paul Demarest, Favret, Demarest, Russo & Lutkewitte, New Orleans, LA, Felix J. Springer, Day, Berry & Howard, Hartford, CT, for appellant.

Joseph L. Waitz, Waitz & Downer, Houma, LA, for appellee.

Dori K. Bernstein, EEOC, Office of Gen. Counsel, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Alma Chasez, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 23, 1994, 5 Cir., 1994, 39 F.3d 537)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.