51 F.3d 283
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
Carlos GARCIA-ROSELL, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 7, 1995.*
Decided March 10, 1995.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.
Carlos Garcia-Rosell appeals the district court's denial of his motion for a new trial. Garcia-Rosell claims he has discovered new exculpatory evidence which the government withheld in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291, and we affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court order and opinion, which fully and fairly addreses Garcia-Rosell's arguments.