OpenJurist

51 F3d 286 Petrick v. Harmon

51 F.3d 286

Rick D. PETRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Judith HARMON and Sylvia Spillman, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-5233.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

March 29, 1995.

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Before ANDERSON, BALDOCK, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. This cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

2

The judgment of the district court dismissing Rick Dean Petrick's civil rights action against his attorneys who were appointed by the Oklahoma Indigent Defense System is AFFIRMED on the grounds and for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed November 14, 1994. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470