538 F2d 858 United States v. Martinez-Fuerte

538 F.2d 858

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Amado MARTINEZ-FUERTE, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jose JIMINEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellee.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Raymond RANGEL GUILLEN and Fernando Medrano-Barragan,
Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 74-2462, 74-2680, 74-2714.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

July 20, 1976.

view counter
1

Jack Robinson, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), San Diego, Cal., for the U. S.

2

Charles M. Sevilla (argued), of Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, Cal., for appellant Martinez-Fuerte.

3

Frank M. Mangan (argued), of Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, Cal., for appellee Jiminez-Garcia.

4

Michael J. McCabe of Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., and E. J. Boone, San Diego, Cal., for appellees Rangel Guillen and Medrano-Barragan.

ORDER

5

Before DUNIWAY and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and WEIGEL, District Judge.

6

Pursuant to the judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States in United States v. Martinez-Fuerte et al., 1976, --- U.S. ----, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 48 L.Ed.2d ---, it is ordered:

7

1. In No. 74-2462, the conviction of the appellant Martinez-Fuerte is affirmed.

view counter
8

2. In No. 74-2680, the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

9

3. In No. 74-2714, the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.