OpenJurist

57 F3d 1066 McLean v. Barnett

Michael MCLEAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Talmadge BARNETT; Michael J. Lamm; Ann Smith; J.P.
Morgan; Charles Walston; Renoice Stancil,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6036.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: June 9, 1995.

57 F.3d 1066
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Michael McLean, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Ray Garvey, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McLean v. Barnett, No. CA-93-772 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 7, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel