OpenJurist

62 F3d 1415 Sherwin v. United States L State T Sherwin

62 F.3d 1415

Charles T. SHERWIN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America; Donald L. Robinson, Defendants--Appellees,
and
STATE of North Carolina, Defendant.
Charles T. SHERWIN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America; George H.W. Bush, President,
United States of America; Donald B. Rice, Secretary, United
States Air Force; Constance Newman, Director, Office of
Personnel Management; Daniel R. Levinson, Chairman, U.S.
Merit Systems Protection Board, Defendants--Appellees.

Nos. 95-1837, 95-1895.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Aug. 10, 1995.
Submitted: July 25, 1995
Decided: August 10, 1995

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, Malcolm J. Howard, District Judges.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Charles T. Sherwin, Appellant Pro Se.

Charles Edwin Hamilton, III, Eileen Coffey Moore, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

In these consolidated appeals, Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's motion for leave of court to file motions on his previous cases in the district court. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sherwin v. United States, Nos. CA-94-48-3-BR; CA-92-56-3-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 20, 1995 & Mar. 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED