73 F. 3d 371 - United States v. Laurine

73 F3d 371 United States v. Laurine

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Lavon Thomas LAURINE, aka Michael Anthony Elliott,
Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-30162.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 1995.*
Decided Dec. 27, 1995.

73 F.3d 371
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Before: SNEED, TROTT and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM**

2

Lavon Thomas Laurine appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following his guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute cocaine base and cocaine. He contends that he was entitled to a downward departure based on extraordinary childhood abuse. "The record fails to suggest that the district court was under the impression that it could not depart downward if it chose to do so." United States v. Heim, 15 F.3d 830, 833 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 95 (1994). We lack jurisdiction to review the district court's discretionary refusal to depart downward. See id.

3

DISMISSED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3