William Thomas EALEY, Jr., Plaintiff--Appellant,
Charles HAWLEY; Thomas Breedlove; Jane Doe; John Keku,
Doctor; Doctor Lites; Doctor Baloch; Doctor Smith;
Doctor Daniels; John Doe; Doctor Davenport; Ms. Kelly;
Doctor Shah; V.L. Evans; Percy Davis; Mr. Batten; Lynn
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 17, 1996.
74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Thomas Ealey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ealey v. Hawley, No. CA-95-490-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.