OpenJurist

79 F3d 1156 Friedman Harold's Pawn Shop Inc v. Friedman

79 F.3d 1156

In re: Bruce Richard FRIEDMAN, Debtor,
HAROLD'S PAWN SHOP, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Bruce Richard FRIEDMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-1599.
(D.C.No. 94-C-311)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

March 15, 1996.

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT1

1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

2

Defendant appeals from the district court's order reversing the bankruptcy court's order dismissing the complaint. Because the district court's order remanded the case for significant further proceedings, we do not have jurisdiction. FHA v. Buckner (In re Buckner), 66 F.3d 263, 265 (10th Cir.1995).

3

APPEAL DISMISSED.

1

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3