OpenJurist

82 F3d 422 Hall v. Browning

82 F.3d 422

Mary Miller HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Robert BROWNING, Judge; Richard Bilby, Judge, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-16762.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 26, 1996.*
Decided April 1, 1996.

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM**

2

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's Order filed on August 15, 1995. See Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11 (1991); United States v. Mitchell, 445 U.S. 535, 538 (1980).

3

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3