OpenJurist

86 F3d 1150 King v. E Thompson

86 F.3d 1150

William H. KING, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Charles E. THOMPSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 95-7950.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 16, 1996.
Decided: May 30, 1996.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-1541-AM)

William H. King, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. King v. Thompson, No. CA-95-1541-AM (E.D.Va. Nov. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED