894 F. 2d 409 - Parez v. San Diego County Social Services

894 F2d 409 Parez v. San Diego County Social Services

894 F.2d 409

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Jirik PAREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 88-6390.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 31, 1989.*
Decided Jan. 22, 1990.

Before WILLIAM A. NORRIS, REINHARDT and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM**

2

Jirik Parez appeals pro se from the district court's dismissal with prejudice of his order against the San Diego County Department of Social Services. Parez contends that the Department violated his Due Process rights by disregarding his litigation expenses in calculating his eligibility for welfare assistance. We affirm, because it "appears to a certainty that [Parez] would be entitled to no relief under any state of facts that could be proved." NL Industries, Inc. v. Kaplan, 792 F.2d 896, 898 (9th Cir.1986). Parez has no constitutional right to have his litigation expenses subsidized by the government.

3

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3