OpenJurist

91 F3d 129 Cox v. P Dodson

91 F.3d 129

Frank COX, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
George P. DODSON; Mr. Braxton; Richard S. Wilson; Jim
Coffee; Pam Hinkle; J.M. Bevins; David B.
Beach; John Does; Jane Does,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6183.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 20, 1996.
Decided July 1, 1996.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Frank Cox, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cox v. Dodson, No. CA-96-5-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 5, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED