914 F2d 264 United States v. A Sagorsky
914 F.2d 264
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
Jeffrey A. SAGORSKY, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 18, 1990.*
Decided Sept. 20, 1990.
Before Goodwin, Chief Judge, Hug and Beezer, Circuit Judges.
Jeffrey A. Sagorsky appeals the district court's order revoking his probation. Sagorsky contends that the district court erred by revoking his probation because the district judge automatically imposed the maximum term of imprisonment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291.
We review for an abuse of discretion or fundamental unfairness a district court's decision to revoke probation. United State v. Tham, 884 F.2d 1262, 1264 (9th Cir.1989).
After careful consideration we find no abuse of discretion.