934 F2d 324 Puett v. Blandford

934 F.2d 324

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Charles Edward PUETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
BLANDFORD, Sgt., Federal Park Police, Newton Sikes, Tom
Girard, John Girard, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-16270.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 29, 1991.*
Decided May 31, 1991.

Before HUG, KOZINSKI and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.




Charles Puett, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the clerk of the district court's refusal to accept certain documents from Puett for filing because they did not comply with Local Rule 155. Puett asks this court to declare Local Rule 155 unconstitutional as applied to pro se litigants. We dismiss this appeal for lack of a final appealable order.




The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4


This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3