935 F.2d 276
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
William Orville HARRISON, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 90-50308 to 90-50310.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 4, 1991.*
Decided June 6, 1991.
Before D.W. NELSON, O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Appellee's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is hereby GRANTED. An order establishing the amount of fees to be awarded under the Criminal Justice Act is an administrative decision by the district court not appealable as a final order under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291. See In re Baker, 693 F.2d 925 (9th Cir.1982).
Appellant's motion to augment the excerpts of record is therefore DISMISSED as moot.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs and without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a), Ninth Circuit R. 34-4