OpenJurist

936 F2d 579 Richmark Corporation v. Timber Falling Consultants

936 F.2d 579

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

RICHMARK CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant,
v.
TIMBER FALLING CONSULTANTS, Defendant/Counterclaim-Third
Party-Plaintiff/Apellee/Cross-Appellant,
v.
PEACOCK MANUFACTURING CO., INC., et al., Third-Party-Defendants,
v.
BEIJING EVER BRIGHT INDUSTRIAL, CO.
Third-Party-Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

No. 91-35281.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 1991.
Decided July 3, 1991.

Before PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and THOMAS G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

Pursuant to the stipulation of both parties filed April 1, 1991, cross-appeal No. 91-35281 is DISMISSED. Each party shall bear its own costs.