OpenJurist

94 F3d 655 Agrawal v. R Edmison

94 F.3d 655

Kris K. AGRAWAL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lawrence R. EDMISON; Porter Baswell; Randy Minyen; Mark
A. Carl; Leonard J. Billingsley; Tana Walker; Phyllis
Robertson; Mike Albano; K. Gary Glover; Lou Klaver; J.A.
Woods; John Does, individually, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6373.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Aug. 14, 1996.

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, BRIGHT,** and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

2

We affirm for substantially the reasons given by the district court.

3

The judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3

**

Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation