963 F.2d 381
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Angel NOLASCO-COTA, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 91-10258.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 11, 1992.*
Decided May 18, 1992.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Before BOOCHEVER, REINHARDT and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
ORDER**
For the reasons stated in United States v. Redondo-Lemos, 955 F.2d 1296 (9th Cir.1992), the judgment of the district court is REVERSED. This case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with Redondo-Lemos.