OpenJurist

982 F2d 529 Roy v. L Henman

982 F.2d 529

Michael ROY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Gary L. HENMAN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

Nos. 92-3327, 92-3358.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Dec. 4, 1992.

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Before LOGAN, JOHN P. MOORE and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(e); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

2

Michael Roy appeals the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus contending his sentence was improperly executed and he is entitled to immediate release. After a review of his brief and the record, we conclude the district court did not err. We AFFIRM its judgment for substantially the same reasons set forth in the memorandum and order entered August 13, 1992.

*

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3