OpenJurist

990 F2d 1378 Welsing v. District of Columbia

990 F.2d 1378

301 U.S.App.D.C. 108, 82 Ed. Law Rep. 336

Frances Cress WELSING, M.D., Appellant,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al.

No. 92-7044.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

March 19, 1993.

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and WILLIAMS and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c). It is

2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed February 25, 1992, granting appellee's motion for summary judgment, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein. See Welsing v. Government of the District of Columbia, 784 F.Supp. 917 (D.D.C.1992).

3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.