¶1Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. The suggested ambiguity requiring interpretation and application of the order may appropriately be made the subject of a ruling at Special Term, Part II. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peck, P. J., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Rabin, JJ.
1 A.D.2d 803
Enzler v. Saretsky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 14, 1956
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1956-02-14
Decided 1956-02-14