1 Ariz. App. 16 - State v. Baca’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 1984
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Brinegar v. United States · Jones v. United States · Draper v. United States · United States v. Rabinowitz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The officers had a reasonable ground to arrest Leeper. Having good information that she was in possession of the gun, they were entitled to arrest her for carrying a concealed weapon ‘without a warrant at any time of the day or night,’ A.R.S. § 13-911 (B).” “As an incident of a legal arrest the search was lawful and not within the ambit of the Fourth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution.” State v. Randall, 94 Ariz. 417, 419 , 385 P.2d 709 (1963).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The Constitution of the United States (Amendment IV) and the Arizona Constitution (Article II, Sec. 8, A.R.S.) do not prohibit all searches and seizures, but only those which are unreasonable. What constituted a reasonable search and seizure must be decided on the facts and circumstances of each particular case, rather than by a fixed standard or formula. * * * ” State v. Baca, 1 Ariz. App. 16 , 398 P.2d 924 (1965).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““ * * * we are now committed to the law that evidence obtained in violation of these rights is not admissible in our Courts in prosecutions against individuals whose rights have been violated, (citations omitted).” State v. Baca, 1 Ariz. App. 16, 17 , 398 P.2d 924, 925 (1965).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McMahon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.