1 Ariz. App. 181 - State v. Anders’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 2009 · most notably 7 Ariz. App. 498 - State v. McGriff (1968), 7 Ariz. App. 170 - State v. Superior Court of Pima County (1968)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Page v. Turcott · Haney v. Eyman · Gregory v. Trousdale County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No legal cause being shown by you, it is the judgment and sentence of this court that you be confined in the Arizona State Prison at Florence, Arizona, for a period of not less than nine nor more then ten years, the date of your imprisonment to begin as of the date of your original incarceration in the Arizona State Prison at Florence, Arizona. You will be given credit for time served.” ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Anders
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.